چکیده:
Just as the media, willingly or unwillingly, influences the political, cultural, social, etc. arenas and introduces new patterns in societies, they themselves are influenced by and influenced by society and its various discourses. One of these areas is the political and governmental system of countries. In any country, with the change of political discourses, tangible changes also occur in the media system of that country. In this study, the effects of three different periods, namely Reform, Principlism and Moderation on the country's press humor were discussed.For this purpose, Three hundred and ninety-nine columns of humor from Keyhan newspaper were studied using content analysis method.According to the research findings, political discourses influence and provoke the media through their treaties, interactions and actions and behavior. It was also found the Keyhan newspaper was often influenced by its policy and examines issues such as nuclear deal, political protests, US relations, etc according to that.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The Impact of Political Discourses on Press Satire (Content Analysis of Kayhan Newspaper 1997-2020) 1 Mahboubeh Sadat Ghaemi Talab Date of Receipt: 2022/07/23 2 Gholamreza Khajeh Sarvi Date of Acceptance: 2022/09/27 Abstract Just as media, whether intentionally or unintentionally, influence political, cultural, social, and other spheres and introduce new patterns into societies, they themselves are under the influence of society and its various discourses and are affected by them.
Keywords: Political Satire - Reformism - Principalism - Moderation - Content Analysis PhD student in Political Sociology at Allameh Tabataba'i University 1 (Corresponding Author) 1 Professor of Political Science at Allameh Tabataba'i University 2 Introduction and Problem Statement With the entry into the era of media and the formation of the information society, the world has begun a new era.
Accordingly, the important issue that will be addressed in this research is how political discourses (in this case, Reformist, Principalist, and Moderation discourses) influence the policy of media.
Frequency of domestic state and governmental institutions and organizations 1376-1383 (Refer to the page image) (Refer to the page image) ** The tables that follow show the discourse of fundamentalism and its related findings.
Frequency of domestic non-governmental groups, organizations, and opposition 1384-1391 (Refer to the page image) (Refer to the page image) ** In this section, we deal with tables related to the moderation discourse, i.
Frequency of domestic non-governmental groups and organizations and the opposition 1392-1399 (Refer to the page image) 11- Conclusion Examination of the information obtained from the research shows that there is a significant difference between each discourse and the other in terms of theme, geographical location, problems and obstacles, etc.
(
, 
, 
)
