چکیده:
In fact, the social stratification of Iran from the third century AH to the thirteenth century AH was almost the same and similar, and in fact the texture, structure and political composition of Iran in the early Qajar era was not much different from previous eras. Because society was divided into two distinct groups, regardless of normal stratification. 1. The privileged and ruling class was at the top. 2- There was also a lower and non-ruling class. What was really going on in the Iranian society in the mentioned fields was very different from the Persian version and model, and questions about all these differences are automatically raised. Today, it is argued that the roots of today's political dilemmas go back to the recent past. In this study, the fundamental question is the political structure of Qajar Iran (a society transitioning from past traditions to modern life and Modern) is studied in order to be able to explain, analyze and describe the roots of the disorders of that era by examining the political structure of the Qajar era in European travelogues. In this research, descriptive-analytical method has been used with the help of referring to library resources.
خلاصه ماشینی:
A Research on the Political System of Iran in the Qajar Era, with Emphasis on the Perspective of European Travel Writers 1 Saeeedeh Foroughmand Date of Receipt: 12/12/1400 2 Daryoosh Rahmanian Date of Acceptance: 18/06/1401 Gholamhossein Zargarinejad3 Reza Shabanip4 1- Abstract In fact, the social stratification of Iran has been similar from approximately the third to the thirteenth century AH, and in reality, the political structure, fabric, and organization of Iran in the early Qajar period did not have a specific difference from previous periods.
Qajar, political composition, stratification, travelogue, elite class 1 PhD student, Department of History, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
The answer to this research is: the political system of Iran has a very long history, and the Qajar era was the heir to this system, and until the Constitutional Revolution, not much change occurred in this structure; in this research, the assumption is that in this structure, the "Shah" held supreme power, and there was no legal system or bilateral commitment between the Shah and the rulers.
Iran and Iranians: An Investigation into One Hundred Travelogues of the Qajar Era, Tehran: Nashr-e Zavar.
M. Tankuni's Travelogue" Letters about Iran and Turkey in Asia, translated by Ali Asghar Saeedi, Tehran: Nashr-e Cheshmeh.
(
, 
, 
)
