چکیده:
The role of the political structure of power and religion is very important and decisive in regulating the political behavior of Iranian society, and each of them can explain a part of the reality of political behavior. After the victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, many opposition currents emerged that opposed the government in various ways and faced difficulties in the path of the revolution. The way they are treated in the middle ranks of the government has always been in an aura of personal taste and desire. Sometimes they have neglected national security and sometimes some of the rights of the opposition have been violated. Opposition groups, meaning political protesters, are inevitable in political systems; To the extent that it can be said that it is impossible to imagine a government without an opposition; Recognition of these groups shows that the opposition abroad, despite some changes, is in fact the opposition of the revolution, and includes a wide range of leftist, liberal and monarchist currents, and some religious currents, all of which are the losers of the revolution. And if it is based on threats and drawing the realm of security, we can say that the main danger is not from outside but from inside, which depends directly on the feedback of the Islamic Republic. This article examines the situation of the opposition in the fortieth anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Iran and their opportunities and threats.
خلاصه ماشینی:
From the beginning of the formation of the sparks of the Constitutional Revolution in Iran, which perhaps for the first time placed a social body led by elites in a structured position against the government, until now, meaning forty years after the Islamic Revolution, the subject of opposition and political opponents has never taken a codified and calculated form.
Pre-revolution examples occurred in a context of social chaos, worsening economic conditions, the instability of the foundations of the Qajar government or the immaturity of the young Shah (Mohammad Reza), and the occurrence of the two World Wars, the first and the second, the direct influence of great Western powers and finally, the intensity of authoritarianism in the spirit of many political elites had occurred.
On the other hand, while declaring attention to opposing views, the system, due to its novelty and internal and external threats, has devoted most of its attention to its own stability, which has been successful to a large extent in the realm of stability; however, considering Iran's historical experience, the existence of diverse ethnicities, different religions, an active young generation, external threats, the dependence of some internal groups on foreigners, and social and class divides, one cannot consider the current stability as permanent without framing the issue of protest, opposition, and permanent opposition, and should not be complacent about the permanence of this calm.
(
, 
, 
)
