چکیده:
The review and critical analysis of the works of writers in the second generation of Iranian contemporary story telling with new means and methods of writing clarify some of the abilities and drawbacks of narration technique of writers apart by detecting some of the hidden aspects of these works. In this research, all of Rasoul Parvizi's stories have been criticized and analyzed in detail based on eight important elements of storytelling. Methodologically, the present study is based on library work with an analytical-descriptive approach. It has been conducted through complete inductivity. The results of this research demonstrate that Parvizi seldom uses the new styles of narration and using them in some cases is due to the nature of his writing and unconsciousness rather than his contemplation and previous thought. In contrast, the use of comic language, the full recognition of the characters in a single geography and intimacy in narration compensate for the lack of new styles in attracting the audience.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Quantitative-Qualitative Content Analysis of the Story Elements in the Tales of Rasul Parvizi (Research Article) Dr. Mohammadbagher Movahedi Mehreabadi 1 Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Payame Noor University, Qom Abstract Re-reading and analytical critique of the works of second-generation contemporary Iranian fiction writers, using modern writing tools and methods, apart from discovering some of the hidden aspects of these works, also clarifies some of the author's abilities or deficiencies in the art of storytelling.
The results obtained in this research indicate that Rasul Parvizi has not utilized modern storytelling techniques; meaning that characters are often static; plots are mostly open-ended and reminiscent; and the stories lack unity of subject and unity of time and place.
"Hossein Paindeh" does not mention him in the book "The Short Story in Iran," and Houshang Golshiri in "Goethe's Poetry Nights" in the year 1356, in his speech, mentions the names of all contemporary storytellers of every scale of work, but only at the end does he mention Rasul Parvizi alongside minor writers whom he considers alive only in appearance (Zandian, 1392: 267).
" and at the end of this very article, it is stated: "In addition to what has been said, Rasul Parvizi is a memoirist who, in what he has written, has no news of story action, characterization, conflict between characters, suspense, or skills of this sort" (Haj-daei, 1389: 4).
Mohammad Hesarnajari and Zabihollah Elahi in the article "Examination of Story Elements in the Story 'Eynak' by Rasul Parvizi from the Pre-University Period Persian Book" (1397) have examined plot, point of view, characterization, time, and place in this work.
(
, 
, 
)
