چکیده:
Economic transparency is one of the most important indexes in democracies. Non control of economic corruption led to weakening of political legitimacy of government. By explanation method and interview to Shiraz"s academic Elites, in this study, has been tried to answer this question: how much is successful and acceptable the function of civil society in it's function and combat to economic corruption and why? The main finding of this study shows the unacceptable function of civil society in Iran due to these reasons: impediments in governmental structures and absence of legal, possible and encouragement opportunities and in other hand due to weakness and dysfunctions in civil society such as none serious practical performance and action in pay attention to political transparency to general demand and shaping a social movement and absent of public opinion In the end, practical recommendation be noted in modification and enforcement of surveillance mechanism and transparency.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The most important topics investigated in the research include: "civil society actions and activities in pursuit of demanding and challenging economic transparency, achievements and successes of civil society, the level of honesty and serious effort to fight corruption, political-governance and economic obstacles and challenges, shortcomings and weaknesses of civil society itself and civil actors, the level of intellectual-ideological and practical support of society or the social body for civil actors and institutions, and finally, practical-applied suggestions of academic elites in Shiraz in the direction of fighting economic corruption and institutionalizing economic transparency.
macro politics, and in order to be realistic and ensure the necessity of comprehensive analysis, this research has attempted to design and analyze questions in pursuit of evaluating the role or performance, achievements, and challenges of civil society in the field of fighting corruption and economic transparency at the three mentioned levels, namely the foundations, opportunities, and challenges or shortcomings at the micro level (citizens), meso level (the actors themselves and institutions or civil associations), and macro-governance level (government and governmental institutions, policies, opportunities, and existing limitations for institutions and civil society).
This unacceptable record was, on one hand, a consequence and result of governmental obstacles and limitations and the lack of effective legal, practical, and incentive-based opportunities for civil society to play a better role, including enlightenment, especially the creation and creation of social movements with the accompaniment of public opinion and the people to institutionalize economic transparency.
(
, 
, 
)
