چکیده:
Risalat Al-Teyrs are narrative texts with the mystical content and the mystic allegory language that with little addition and removal, change and transposition are affected by each other. Now among the Risalat Al-Tayrs which one is borrowed from the other and in terms of narratology which is the sicence of minimum narration, how is it possible to investigate the effect and influence of these works? In this article, using the narratology approach from the perspective of of Searle's speech act and Genette's Hypertextuality with analytical methodology-descritive and libererian libererian tools, we aim to investigate the intertexuality link of persian and Arabic Risalat Al-Tayrs. We believe these texts are Hypertextuality and recent narrators were consciously affected from the previous ones. Considering 17 similar sequence in these works, we found that except the Ghasideh Eyniyeh that has were few similar sequence with other Risalats, Ibne-Sina and Mohammad Ghazzali's Risalat Al-Teyrs and Mohammad Ghazzali with two different structure are foretexts. Ahmad Ghazzali's Risalat Al-Teyrs describe more details compared to Mohammad Ghazzali's Risalts. Risalats of Chachi, Eynol-Ghozat, Mantegho-Tayr & Kashfol-Asrar, have taken the general pattern from the Risalat of Mohammad Ghazzali but with the changes in the sequence, have saved their works from general immitation and have some innovation in validity structure their works. The Risalat of Sohrevardi is so similar to the Ibn-Sina's in the first part, but Sohrevardi used different sequences and was able to new work.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Investigating Adaptation in the Narration of Persian and Arabic Risalat al-Tayr From the Perspective of the Link between John Searle's Speech Act Theory and Gerard Genette's Hypertextuality Samira Shafiei 1* (Received: 2019/07/17 - Accepted: 2019/10/28) Abstract Risalat al-Tayr are narrative texts with mystical content and allegorical language.
Relying on the narratological approach from the perspective of Searle's speech act theory and Genette's hypertextuality, this article aims to investigate the intertextual relationship between the Persian and Arabic Risalat al-Tayr using a descriptive-analytical method and library tools.
Among the Persian and Arabic Risalat Al-Tayrs, the present study aims to see which one is borrowed from the other, and in terms of narratology, how it is possible to investigate the effect and influence of these works relying on Searle's speech act theory and Genette's Hypertextuality by borrowing an analytical-descriptive research method.
In these treatises, seventeen outcomes were extracted: Tahmidiyya; the arrival of hunters, the captivity and freedom of the birds; the gathering of birds to find the king and their consensus; searching for the Simurgh's nest; the warning of a herald to the birds; describing the journey route; the longing of the birds and their movement towards the Simurgh; the death of all/some of the birds; arriving 110 (Refer to the page image) Total 5 According to the table above, the most frequent application of transformations in Risalat al-Tayr is quantitative transformations of the expansion type; meaning that as we move from the earliest treatises toward the later treatises, the topics increase quantitatively and are presented more extensively.
(
, 
, 
)
