چکیده:
The subject of this article is to examine the performance of the reformist government based on indicators of good governance. The basic premise of the study is that the reformist government has acted in accordance with these principles and based on the principles of good governance, although due to the nature of state in Iran, which according to the constitution as the most important legal structure of the country, is just one of the existing institutions. Also it is not equivalent to the state in its Weberian sense - having the highest power of legitimate violence. The results of the study show that the government with its special structure in Iran - as an executive institution - is relatively successful in terms of good governance such as participation, rule of law, transparency, accountability, consensus building, justice, efficiency and effectiveness and accountability. The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical and based on this, library and internet resources and existing and non-classified documents are used. The method of data collection is also the method of taking fish.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The basic assumption of this research is that the Reformist government has acted in line with and based on the principles of good governance regarding the aforementioned indicators, although due to the nature of the government in Iran which, according to the Constitution, as the most important legal structure of the country, is one of the existing institutions - among other institutions - and is not equivalent to the government in its broad concept - does not possess the highest power of legitimate violence.
The results of the research show that the government, with its specific structure in Iran - as an executive institution - has achieved relative success in good governance indicators such as participation, rule of law, transparency, accountability, consensus building, justice, efficiency, effectiveness, and responsiveness.
1- Theoretical Framework: Good Governance and its Elements In the modern era, the first authoritative reference that has raised discussions in this field is the World Bank, which in a 1989 report defined it as providing efficient public services, a reliable judicial system, and an accountable administrative system.
" (The IMF, 2001) In the field of good governance, numerous definitions have been provided by national and international individuals and institutions; including the United Nations Development Program, 1, which defines governance as the exercise of political, economic, and administrative power (authority) for the management of national affairs at all levels.
(
, 
, 
)
