چکیده:
The adherence of a reading to the Accepted Uthmanic Text (Rasm al-Mushaf) is one of the important criteria in accepting the reading. This Criterion which promulgated after Uthmanic collection of the Quran for the purpose of excluding some companions’ Readings, has had a lot of changes in later times. Criterion of Rasm was at first used to represent the adherence of a reading to the written text generally, but in later times it was examined in more detail. In addition, there had been some Readers who payed less attention to the written text of the Quran which led to serious conflictions in some cases like Ibn Shanabudh’s case. In general, the criterion of adherence to Rasm al-Mushaf has had five important historical stages as the following: 1- starting to pay attention to the written text of the Quran as a criterion; 2- promulgation of the discourse of Rasm al-Mushaf; 3- widespread use of Rasm al- Mushaf in reasonings; 4- stabilization of Rasm al-Mushaf criterion 5- final revising of Rasm al-Mushaf criterion.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Therefore, conformity with the Rasm of the Mushaf in the science of Qira'at means the necessity of matching the recitation with one of the Uthmanic Mushafs (Ibn al-Jazari n.
Similarly, he did not consider the recitation of the word "malik" in Surah al-Hamd acceptable due to its non-conformity with the Rasm al-Mushaf (Ibn Khalawayh 1985 AD: 23).
He considered the condition of conformity with Rasm al-Mushaf, alongside the conditions of authenticity of the chain of transmission and the strength of the linguistic aspect in the Arabic language, to be necessary in the recitation of the Qur'an considered (for more information, see Makki bin Abi Talib 1975 AD: 89-91; 1405 AD: Vol. 1, 69, 388; 1429 AH, Vol. 3, 3250).
For example, he considered the recitation of the final alif in the words "al-Zununa", "al-Rasula", and "al-Sabila" (Ahzab: 10, 66, 67) to be preferable based on the criterion of conformity with Rasm al-Mushaf and has based his choice on this (regarding this, see Makki bin Abi Talib 1404 AH: Vol. 2, 194 - 195).
For example, regarding the criterion of conformity with the Arabic language, contrary to his predecessors including Ibn Khalawayh and Makki bin Abi Talib, he considered even the weak aspect to be acceptable (Fadli 1430 AH: 122).
Regarding the criterion of conformity with Rasm al-Mushaf, he stated that the recitation of a word is acceptable even if it is compatible with its probable spelling.
(
, 
, 
)
