چکیده:
The purpose of this study is to investigate the consequences of regional security polarization in the Middle East. The hypothesis is that the polarization of regional security has led to the emergence and spread of geopolitical chaos in the Middle East. The research method is qualitative and we have used Buzan's identity structure approach. The results show that the United States is pursuing the necessary conditions for regional destabilization and the continuation of the chaos and destabilization process. In such circumstances, Iran's approach should be to manage the turbulent atmosphere and crisis management through mechanisms focused on diplomacy and empowerment. The United States has used a "cluster coalition strategy" to manage regional security. The behavioral pattern of these actors in dealing with Iran is of an aggressive nature. In American strategic thinking, regional asymmetries are often conceivable from a technological point of view. In an asymmetric environment, the equation of power and architecture of the armed forces is different from the classical and symmetrical environment. Therefore, topics such as: "use of manpower", "weapons", "sources of power", "defense architecture", "security engineering", "command and management" in an asymmetry environment are completely different from the classical environment.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Keywords: Geopolitical chaos, Middle East, crisis escalation, regional security polarization, Iran, America * PhD student, International Relations, Islamic Azad University, Shahrud, Iran (gmail.
" Regional and global actors, with their security, ideological, and geopolitical considerations and their presence in Syria in the form of proxy wars and its transformation into a regional crisis, have placed the internal confrontations of the Syrian state-nation under scrutiny (Rose, 2017, p.
Foundations of Polarity in the Middle East Security Environment Barry Buzan attempts to explain the material, structural components, and the processual action pattern of actors in the formation of identity competitions.
The existing patterns of friendship and enmity among regional actors in the Middle East and their mutual dependence on each other in the Middle East security complex, alongside the great global powers seeking their interests in the Middle East, have established Middle Eastern polarity with the centrality of America, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Turkey on one side, and Russia, Iran, and Syria on the other.
Overall, the radicalization of the Middle East is a function of the role-playing of identity, political, and security groups, where each regional actor and great power pursues its geopolitical competitions through the reproduction of concepts and the mobilization of ideological groups.
After the Cold War and the increasing importance of regional powers, we are witnessing the expansion of geopolitical and identity competitions among Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt as important Middle Eastern actors, which has led to increased regional tensions.
(
, 
, 
)
