چکیده:
At the same time with Bakhtin's (1895-1975) drafting, in the early twentieth century, about "Logic of conversation” that provided the basis for the theory of Intertextuality in the 60s by Julia Christova(1941- ), Badiozzaman Forouzanfar(1899-1970) created a critical approach in writing of Sokhan-O-Sokhanvaran (printed 1929-1933) that later Abdolhossein Zarrinkoob in his literary Criticism book referred to it as "Criticism of influence" (printed 1959). This study seeks to explain Forouzanfar's attempt in creating a coherent way of expressing the efficacy and influence in form and content in Persian poetry and to compare it with “criticism of influence”, introducing it as an independent critical approach. Forouzanfar, maneuvering on the old topic of plagiarism, changed it into an effective and practical tool to describe literary influences in the Persian poetry, and despite the distance from the theoretical origins of intertextuality, he applied similar concepts in analyzing literary relationships in poetry and determining the role and position of poets in the context of history.
خلاصه ماشینی:
A Methodological Analysis of the Issue of Literary Influence and Effect in Baz Dehan's Sokhan va Sokhanvaran * Ahmad Khatami ** Maryam Mosharraf Malek *** Azam Saadat Abstract Coinciding with the presentation of Bakhtin's ideas regarding the "logic of dialogue" in the early twentieth century, which served as a precursor to the formulation of the theory of intertextuality by Julia Kristeva in the 1960s, Badi' al-Zaman Foruzanfar, in his authorship of Sokhan va Sokhanvaran, introduced a critical approach that was later explained by Abdolhossein Zarrinkoub under the title "Criticism of Influence" in the book Naqd-e Adabi.
It seems that this critical approach in Foruzanfar's work is the natural result of explaining the intellectual influence and effect of poets within the historical context of the literary work "Sokhan va Sokhanvaran"; in such a way that it identifies and maps the points of emergence of creative and influential elements in poetry and their path of movement in the chain of history.
Foruzanfar's method was an independent approach in the continuation and evolution of the method of Persian tadhkirah writers in diagnosing traditional or innovative poems, which, parallel to the formation of the theoretical field of intertextuality, was employed in the composition of Sokhan va Sokhanvaran and has mapped the movement and transformation of influential elements in poetry within a specific historical period.
By recognizing the heritage of ancient Arabic and Persian critical principles, Foruzanfar made magnificent interventions in those principles and, apparently without familiarity with Western methods, gave an effective function to the issue of literary theft through a coherent and reasoned method, elevating it to the level of a practical approach for mapping poetic connections in the historical course of a specific period.
(
, 
, 
)
