چکیده:
Changes in linguistic potentials and the expansion of vocabulary storage، and the development of syntetic and rhetoric patterns in different periods of time may result in different readings and recreation of the texts. Tadhkirah (memorandum) and biographies are no exceptions. Infact، each revision of literary texts creates a new picture of the previous text. In order to find the facts in the texts with real and historical basis، especially in the history of literature، comparing writings in different periods of time and the differences between narratives according to linguistic features and intellectual features of that period is very important. It shows the difference in people’s thoughts in each period and the effect of external factors on the creation of the literary works. In " Maqamat-e Zhandeh Pil" there is a narration about Ahmad-e Jam which is narrated in one of the manuscripts of Tehran University too، but in a different way. In addition to correcting this manuscript، this research aims at finding those instances that show how narrators and those who write memorandums with some subtle changes in describing his characteristics and manners through a sentence or just a word demonstrate an obscure picture of Sheikh-e Jam. Comparing these two narratives show that in addition to some linguistic and rhetoric differences، there are some changes in the setting، and description of the events and actions which indicate that the narrators have not been that loyal to the original text. However، their similarity in sentencing and narration indicates the existence of an alder narration of the story which has probably been the source of both these manuscripts. Considering contents، both writers explicitly illustrate the same historical and geographical information about the subject with no discordance. Furthermore، this story is a clear document indicating the power and state of Suffiya in that era.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Ahmad Jam and Hagiographers in a Handwritten Tale of War and "Maqamat-e Zandepil" * Maryam Zamani Abstract Analyzing the rewriting of literary texts in different historical periods, considering linguistic changes in the realms of vocabulary, syntax, and rhetoric, can demonstrate the transformation of concepts and images contained within those works and the impact of historical changes on texts.
To find the truth in texts that have a real and historical basis, especially in mentioning the history of literature, comparing these periods of writing and the difference of each narrative from another, taking into account the linguistic and intellectual characteristics of that period, is important and indicates the course of evolution and the difference in the thought of the people of each period and the influence of external factors on the creation of the work.
Text of the manuscript available in the university The written explanation of Sheikh Ahmad Jam to Sultan Sanjar bin Melkshah The origin of this tale and the reason for this narration is that Toghrul Takin was one of the pillars of the state and the notables of His Majesty Sultan Sanjar bin Melkshah, and the ruler of the world had delegated the provinces of Jam to him by way of iqta, and intended for him to establish a court in the town of Saghū, which was his capital.
Sheikh al-Islam did not grant it and sent such a reply: "How can the wood intended for Ahmad's Khanqah be used and transported to the Amir's court?" The messenger returned, and when the person who had given the advice was present, he said: "What a strange thing!
(
, 
, 
)
