Instead of the Editor's Note; June 5th and confronting Western misrepresentations against Iranian-Islamic culture سرمقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

the Pahlavi regime on June 5, 1963, and the Islamic Revolution in 1979, have addressed, if we look at this movement only from this angle, namely the fear of an uncertain and risky future that arose as a result of the transformations in Iran after the August 19, 1953 coup; and if we consider the return of the Iranian nation to religion in the political sphere as resulting from the confusion, terror, and ambiguity of the transformative prospects during the Pahlavi era and before it, the greatness of Imam's movement will not be diminished, and repeated readings of this movement and its future prospects will protect us from the terrors of ambiguity-inducing and uncertain prospects. Therefore, questioning the future prospects of Imam Khomeini's movement is a question that lies within the context of various themes of this collection; it is not a question intended to be given a binding answer that such an act is irrational, but rather so that the issues afflicting the Iranian nation in the last hundred years can be expressed within the framework of this question, and its problems and potential solutions can be thought about and determined: why did the great nation of Iran, from among all the existing flashy and pompous political options and from among all the currents, groups, and parties, and from among all the ideologies, philosophies, and political theories, choose Imam Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution? One of the fundamental principles of the 15th of Khordad movement was the struggle against these very pessimisms that the Pahlavi regime, the Western-oriented current, Orientalists, and their supporting pillars always practiced regarding the history, religion, culture, language, and literature of Iran, the resources and capital of this country, and the abilities and talents of this nation, in order to pave the way for accepting their masters.