چکیده:
The present study aimed at assessing the intrinsic quality of the teachers and students of undergraduate courses in public universities was conducted in Tehran. In this regard, the curriculum consists of four basic elements (objectives, content, teaching methods, evaluation) were evaluated. The method used in this research combines methods (quantitative - qualitative). The statistical population included all of Tehran University students and faculty at these universities are public. The sample consisted of 20 professors and 384 students were selected based on Morgan, In analyzing the data, the analysis of qualitative (descriptive analysis), using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency and distribution), inferential of (t test for independent samples) to compare students and teachers used is located. The findings represent the consensus of the majority of students, curriculum elements lessons to the public, Expressed in a questionnaire responses made, indicates that the status quo in terms of public education elements such as goals, content, teaching methods and evaluation of the curriculum is not desirable, The objective element of general education courses at the intermediate level students and teachers' point of view implies an optimum level.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In another study, Arefi (2008) titled "Necessity and solutions for improving the general courses curriculum of the bachelor's period from the perspective of students and faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University," based on the identified results, this research showed that the existence of a general higher education curriculum is necessary from the perspective of students and professors, and thematic-content solutions for improving the general higher education curriculum possess greater priority.
This question shows the difference between the perspectives of faculty members and students regarding the current status of the undergraduate general courses curriculum, which has been divided into five elements: objectives, content, teaching methods, and evaluation methods, each of which has been investigated separately, and its results are described in the following tables respectively: Evaluating the internal quality of undergraduate general courses from the perspective of ...
The mean score of professors' opinions regarding the current status of content 16 Journal of Qualitative Research in Curriculum, Year 1, Number 2, Spring 2016 general courses is 2.
This indicates that the teaching method element of the general courses curriculum in the undergraduate period is far from the desirable level and revision 20 Journal of Qualitative Research in Curriculum, Year 1, Number 2, Spring 2016 of the teaching method of these courses seems necessary, and higher education planners should be aware of this issue in their future work plans and pay more attention to it.
(
, 
, 
)
