چکیده:
Estimating the real exchange rate misalignment from the equilibrium value and exploring the factors affecting its changes is crucial for both economic policymakers and economic agents. Among the various factors affecting exchange rate misalignment, the exchange rate regime, has received less attention in experimental studies. Accordingly, the present paper seeks to find out the answer to the question of how real exchange rate misalignment is affected by different exchange rate regimes. In other words, in which of the exchange rate regimes is the exchange rate misalignment less and in which one it is higher? To answer the question, the propensity score matching approach has been used. For this purpose, we have used data from 116 developing countries with different exchange rate regimes in 2019. Other factors such as real exchange rate misalignment in the previous period, inflation, the quality of institutions and financial development have been considered as match variables to net the effect of the exchange rate regime on real exchange rate misalignment and to separate the effects of other variables. The results showed that the real exchange rate misalignment from its equilibrium level has responded significantly to the type of exchange rate regime adopted by the countries, so that the floating exchange rate regime increases the real exchange rate misalignment in the selected developing countries wherever implemented. It can be argued that factors such as high exchange rate fluctuations, a more drastic adjustment in the price level, and speculative bubbles or contagion effects in the floating exchange rate regime have led to an increase in these misalignments.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Now, to investigate the effect of adopting different exchange rate systems on real exchange rate deviation based on the stated theoretical foundations, and given the propensity score matching method explained in the next section, the empirical model of this study for the target sample is defined as equation (2).
Tolerance to Misalignment 98 | Iranian Economic Research | Year 27 | No. 93 | Winter 2022 In equation (2), MIS is the real exchange rate misalignment which has been estimated and extracted for the target countries using the Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR)2 model based on United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)1 information3.
5. World Development Indicators 100 | Iranian Economic Research | Year 27 | No. 93 | Winter 2022 In the implementation of any social or economic program, some individuals and units may participate while others do not; this can exist at the international level; for example, some countries may choose a certain type of exchange rate system (treatment variable) and others may not.
2. Covariates 106 | Iranian Economic Research | Year 27 | No. 93 | Winter 2022 In the following, the empirical results of the multiple matching estimator using the Abadie and Imbens 1 (2002) method for the average treatment effect of the exchange rate regime on the real exchange rate deviation in relation to the treatment group 2 (ATT) are presented.