چکیده:
One of the ideals that is always raised in macroeconomic discussions is the stability and sustainability of a country's economy. It is always possible that due to external factors or under the influence of certain internal factors, this stability and sustainability may face threats and a state of instability may prevail in the economy. One of the main concerns of economists and policymakers is returning the economies of countries to conditions of stability and sustainability. In conventional economic literature, regarding the external pressures imposed on the economies of countries, many studies have been conducted, and specific concepts have been used to measure and evaluate the entry of these pressures and the degree of tolerance and resistance of economies against these pressures. Concepts such as resilience, economic vulnerability, economic fragility, sustainability and continuity, strength and mutual continuity, stability, the robustness of models and institutions, and the uniform state of macroeconomics address the issue of the entry of external pressures into the economy and how the macroeconomy reacts to these pressures. On the other hand, in the Iranian economy after the imposition of economic sanctions and economic warfare that arrogant countries have launched against the nation and the system of the Islamic Republic of Iran in recent decades, the Supreme Leader, in 1389, for the first time in his speech to entrepreneurs, used the term 'Resistance Economy' and gradually explained the components of this type of economy. In this article, the distinction between the components existing in conventional economic literature that are somewhat similar to the concept of the resistance economy (focusing on the two concepts of resilience and vulnerability) and the concept of the resistance economy in the statements of the Supreme Leader is addressed, and in the summary of the analysis, a conceptual comparison is made among the distinctions of these concepts.
خلاصه ماشینی:
His emphases on the subject of "social justice" in Nowruz 1372, "work conscience and social discipline" in 1373, "economic and financial discipline and combating waste and excessiveness and recommending frugality" during the years 1374 to 1377, "emphasis on the issue of employment" in 1380, and also his annual naming with an emphasis on economic topics such as the year 1387 as the year of "innovation and prosperity," the year 1388 as the year of "improving the consumption pattern," the year 1389 as the year of "double effort and double work," the year 1390 as the year of "economic jihad," the year 1391 as the year of "national production and support for Iranian labor and capital," and finally the year 1392 as the year of "political epic and economic epic," as well as naming the current decade as the "decade of justice and progress" and raising fundamental economic discussions such as the "Islamic-Iranian pattern of progress and resistance economy," are all clear and explicit evidence of directing the country's economic management towards a comprehensive and efficient model of economic management in an Islamic country, taking into account the lofty ideals of Khomeini ِ Kabir (RA), the martyrs of the Holy Defense, and all the well-wishers of the Islamic Revolution in exporting the revolution and culture at the international level and presenting a superior management style based on Islamic principles ِ is.
(
, 
, 
)
