چکیده:
Most of the members of developing countries influence current international system depending on their interaction with super power in particular the United States of America and transatlantic interaction in the framework of its reaction against tension and international incidents. After the end of Cold War، European Union tried to improve and regain its position in international system. They rejected the use of force as a mean of attaining their objectives and emphasize placed on diplomacy، business linkage، international law، multilateralism as tools of resolving conflicts instead of the previous policy. This article aims to analyze the effects of these policies on transatlantic interaction with United State of America and also the position and the role of European Union in international system. It also tries to work on different opinions of the two super powers and the result of current issues that the difference of opinion will put European Union against American hegemony. This article will give some suggestions about improvement of the European Union goals in the international system.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In this regard, by criticizing existing forms of representation, protesting against poverty, and opposing war, developing countries seek to propose their envisioned justice-oriented order as a suitable model of order in international relations and thereby advance their goals in the arena of the international system.
Today, globalization 1- United Nations Conference on Trade And Development (ANCTAD) 2- Economies in Transition 3- Amartya Sen Economy, as development and hegemony of an economic productive system in the arena of the international system, has disproportionately concentrated financial and commercial affairs in the countries of the North and then in the most specific form in the cities of these countries.
The global capitalist system, by utilizing the interaction between global market forces and political or legal institutions, has brought its views and foundations of hegemony to the fore in the arena of the international system and has given them continuity at three levels: a) Private agreements and private forms of authority in the global market that multinational companies have created and directed through commercial law, while the capital of these companies themselves has created a kind of global governance without government 1, albeit in a weak form; b) Regulatory mechanisms such as the World Trade Organization 2, which emerged through trade agreements between nation-states that directly control specific methods of international trade and production and even revive economic nationalism, which engages in the distortion of liberal ideals based on personal interests; such as the use of protectionist policies in the direction of steel and agricultural production; c) General rules that are applied at the international or global level and are supported by international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank 3.
(
, 
, 
)
