چکیده:
Houshang، second mythical king of Iran، is introduced as Pishdad in historical texts. He had the most important duties such as collecting water in ponds، ordering to hunt wild animals، clothes making، carpeting using animal''s Skin، and encouraging people to agriculture. Arabic historical texts are written in the early Islamic centuries narrating the stories of Persian kings. They were derived from Khodaynameh and then translated. Ferdowsi in Shahnameh has introduced Houshang as the second Persian king and has written on his actions. The analysis and comparison with other narratives based on the hypertextuality not only reveals the origins of these texts، but also shows the differences in narrative texts representing the fact that the texts have used Various versions of Khodaynameh.source of Ferdowsi and tha''alibi was not a common and work of tha''alibi is hypertext that history of tabari is its hypotext
خلاصه ماشینی:
Comparison of the Myth of Hushang in the Shahnameh and the Khoday-namahs Based on Genetic Hypertextuality 1 Hamed Safi 2 Dr. Farzad Ghaemi 3 Dr. Mahdokht Pourkhalghi Chatroudi Abstract The story of Hushang is narrated in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh and Arabic histories; histories such as Ghurar al-Siyar by Tha'alibi, Athar al-Baqiya by Biruni, al-Bad' wa al-Tarikh by al-Maqdisi, and Tarikh Sunni Muluk al-Ard wa al-Anbiya by Hamza Isfahani, all of which have acknowledged the use of Khoday-namahs and Siyar al-Muluk in compiling the history of the kings of Iran.
Dividing the narration of Hushang in the considered texts into propositions and developments and analyzing them based on genetic hypertextuality shows that the connection of the Hushang narration in the Shahnameh with the narration of this Pishdadian king in the Khoday-namahs is of the poetic permutation type.
The analysis of these similarities and dissimilarities will be determined based on Genette's hypertextuality, which will specify what kind of relationship exists between the Shahnameh and the Khoday-namahs and what transformations and changes have converted the pre-text of the Khoday-namahs into the post-text of the Shahnameh in the Hushang section.
Mode | Relationship | Playful | Satirical | Serious Transformation | Parody | Travesty (mocking) 5 | Transposition 6 Imitation | Pastiche 7 | Caricature 8 | Forgery 9 13 Transposition itself is divisible into various types such as translation 10, versification 11, prosification 12, metrical variation, and transtylization.
(
, 
, 
)
