چکیده:
A major question for higher education financial planners at macro level is the current pattern of financial resource allocation within colleges and what factors effect on interuniversity financial resource allocation. To answer this question، it is necessary to identify the interuniversity resource allocation pattern. The purpose of present research is to survey and determine the factors that have most contribution on colleges financial resource allocation. In other words، the aim is to answer the question of، what factors do universities consider when they want to allocate financial resource to their colleges in financial scarcely years? In this paper، we utilized descriptive-correlation and regression analysis methods with longitudinal-cross data to analysis resource allocation function. The population was all public universities affiliated to the Ministry of Science، Research and Technology. The sample was 15 colleges and 4 research centers in 4 years’ time period (totally 76 cases). The research instrument was the Financial and Educational Data Form. Because of few colleges in sample، we used panel data approach for regression analysis with fixed effect. In these methods، time series data with cross-sectional data are combined. The result showed that “number of faculty per college” have greatest positive effect on amount of financial resource allocation per college. The “number of students in college” had no significant effect on resource allocation function، and showed that financial resource allocation within Iranian public universities is not “per student”.
خلاصه ماشینی:
efrfnfcsfs 10 Abdian, m0 (1994)0 EStimation of effectiVe factor on uniVerSitieS pub1ic budgetingJ R,vpwh( ,A RG)GhpME hwC y(hwwTw& Tw uT&EGp ICvMheT,w, 3, (13-14), 97-142(in perSian)0 20 AShar, H0, & shapiro, J0 W0 (1988)0 meaSuring centra1ity: A note on Heckman,S reSource-a11ocation theory0 rCKTwT)epheTSG oMTGwMG dvhpeGp(n, 33, 275-2830 30 AZar, A0 (2007)0 DeSigning budgeting mathematica1 programming for pub1ic organiZationS, fuZZy approach0 (Doctora1 diSSertation)0 Tehran UniVerSity, Tehran, Iran (in perSian)0 40 Ba1tagi, B0 (1995) IM,w,KGepTM hwh(n)T) ,A yhwG( Cheh0 John Wi1ey and sonS paper, 2560 50 Be11aS, m0L0 (1994)0 Comparab1e Worth in academia: The effectS on facu1ty Sa1arieS of the SeX compoSition and 1abor-market conditionS of TMh) RGSTGB, 59،807-8210&,)academic diScip1ineS0 rKGpTMhw o,MT, 60 Dabagh, R0 (1996)0 DiStribution of pub1ic fundS betWeen uniVerSitieS during 1995-19960 dvhpeGp(n R,vpwh( ,A RG)GhpME hwC y(hwwTw& Tw uT&EGp ICvMheT,w, 2(13, 14), 143-180(in perSian)0 70 Chaffee, E0 E0 (1983)0 RheT,wh( CGMT)T,wQKhDTw& Tw ET&EGp GCvMheT,w0 Bou1der, Co: Nationa1 Center for Higher Education management syStemS0 80 C1ark, B0R0 (1992)0 bEG GwMnM(,pGCTh ,A ET&EGp GCvMheT,w0 NeW York: pergamon preSS0 90 d,sy1Va, p0 (1998)0 EXamining reSource a11ocation Within U0s0 pub1ic reSearch uniVerSitieS: An income production approach0 (Unpub1iShed doctora1 diSSertation)0 UniVerSity of AriZona, TucSon0 210 mu1tip1e Criteria DeciSion making(mCDm) The significance of the external environment's impact on intra-university allocation (faculty power) in the allocation of financial resources to faculties is consistent with the research of Clark and Mahoney (1992, Clark).
(
, 
, 
)
