چکیده:
The study of disarmament and arms control is a subfield of general international relations studies, and theorizing in the field of disarmament and arms control, which is considered one of the important policies of governments, is among the significant concerns of this science. Especially with the emergence of the atomic bomb and the evolution of nuclear doctrines, the concepts of disarmament and arms control have become a central axis of strategic studies. The present writing, as its title suggests, attempts to examine the position of international disarmament and arms control regimes in international relations theories and more precisely investigates the question: what are the descriptions, explanations, and predictions of the theories presented in international relations regarding disarmament and arms control regimes? To investigate this issue, first the main elements and fundamental perspectives related to disarmament and arms control in international relations are reviewed, and disarmament and arms control regimes are examined based on prominent theories such as realism and neorealism, liberalism and neoliberalism, constructivism, Marxism and dependency, and postmodernism.
خلاصه ماشینی:
To investigate this issue, first the main elements and basic perspectives related to disarmament and arms control in international relations are reviewed, and disarmament and arms control regimes are examined based on prominent theories such as realism and neorealism, liberalism and neoliberalism, constructivism, Marxism and dependency, and postmodernism.
Alongside the opposition of proponents of militarism and arms expansion, most legal scholars, while accepting the existing situations and the advantages of the arms control regime for a world free of weapons, war, and 73 violence, are very concerned about the content of the treaties concluded within the framework of this regime and their approaches, and especially the way states act in fulfilling their arms control obligations, and they consider them steps backward that cause an increase in threats to lasting international peace and security.
The assertiveness of some Western states and their unilateral approach to the issue of disarmament and arms control has caused this process to turn into a tool for securing the exclusive interests of the West, and weak countries in this field are perceived merely as "subjects"—meaning objects or persons for whom the rules and regulations of international law are formulated—rather than true legislators; and the situation of nuclear disarmament is clear evidence of this claim (Saed, 1383: 66).
(
, 
, 
)
