چکیده:
The political events and developments in the years following the collapse of the bipolar system show that a wider spectrum of countries has been exposed to political regime change. In this process, US security action patterns have undergone changes. Security is regarded as a structural necessity. Therefore, the issue of political regime change in countries like Syria should be considered part of the US security interests in the geopolitical region of the Arab Middle East, which also holds special importance for the security of Israel and Europe. The events of the spring and summer of 2011 in the Arab Middle East show that the US has utilized the pattern of appropriating social developments. Based on such an approach, the US behavior pattern in Egypt and Tunisia was based on crisis control, and therefore, the change of rulers took place instead of changing the structure. The approach of American agents in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain was also based on the structure-agent preservation model. However, the operational attitudes of the US, France, Germany, and England in Syria are different, in such a way that they intend to politically overthrow the structure of the Ba'ath Party and the radical political system of Syria. To achieve this goal, they utilize tactics such as delegitimization, loss of legitimacy, identity construction and identity rebranding, mobilization of social groups, and creating a sense of relative deprivation. Each of the aforementioned tactics can be considered part of US security policy towards political regime change in Syria. This approach is explained and analyzed based on Michael Doyle's neoliberal approach and the political thought of the democratic state by Immanuel Kant.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Social movements and organized Islamic groups can be considered among the important factors in objectifying the scattered mental dissatisfactions of citizens against authoritarian governments in Middle Eastern countries, including Syria.
Although the geopolitical conditions and power tools of Bashar 8 Assad are very different from Muammar Gaddafi, the United States is attempting to use patterns such as international solidarity to confront Syria.
In this way, the United States attempted to provide the grounds for activating the relative advantage of Syrian identity groups in protest actions against the Bashar al-Assad government.
The aforementioned components show that despite the presence of signs of resistance identity in the actions of the protesting groups in Syria, it should be considered a reflection of manifestations of social engineering by the United States, Western countries, and some Arab countries of the region, organized in line with the policy of regime change in non-aligned political systems.
America's behavioral pattern shows that this country attempts, through the activation of social forces and identity groups, to make the structure 14 of the government and political system of Syria undergo gradual erosion.
American media trusts in the international system, by employing communication tools, play an effective role in creating erosion in the structure and political processes of non-aligned Middle Eastern countries such as Syria.
Media are the most important and influential tools for organizing new political identities for social groups in order to confront the political structure of governments opposing American hegemony, including Syria1.
(
, 
, 
)
