چکیده:
By outset of principality era in Islamic republic، speech acts and behavior of iran in foreign policy has been changed. The main question of article is: what is the cause of change in foreign policy of principality administration? Authors، as their main hypothesis، argue that the feeling of ontological insecurity has caused reconfiguration of identity resources ، foreign policy and change in principality approach toward foreign arena. Authors describe the nuke diplomacy of principality as the most important aspect of their approach.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Ontological Security in Foreign Policy The Era of Principlism Date of Receipt: 2012/03/10 Date of Acceptance: 2012/05/14 1* Seyed Jalal Dehghani Firouzabadi 2** Vahid Noori Abstract With the beginning of the era of Principlism in the Islamic Republic, Iran's discursive and behavioral approach in the arena of foreign policy underwent a transformation.
The adoption of an aggressive diplomacy in the foreign arena, a shift away from the West and a tendency toward the East, Islamic countries, Latin America, and Africa, the intensification of a hostile approach toward the Zionist regime, and the emphasis on maintaining and advancing nuclear technology, are considered among the most important components of change in the foreign policy of this period compared to the foreign policy of the Construction and Reform eras.
The provisional answer as the main hypothesis is that the sense of ontological insecurity among the policymakers of the Islamic Republic has led to the redefinition and reconfiguration of the identity-constituting sources of foreign policy and, consequently, a change in the foreign policy approach of the Principlists.
In the third section, the identity-constituting sources in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran are analyzed, and the routine behaviors derived from them are stated.
Fourth, justice-seeking throughout history has always been one of the identity components of Iranians, the manifestation of which in foreign policy is highly aligned with many principles and goals of Third World countries regarding international relations (Dehghani Firouzabadi and Nouri, 2012: 69-70).
(
, 
, 
)
