چکیده:
Religion has always been a determining and role-playing factor in human life, and the study of religion has been a concern for thinkers of every era. From the perspective of a divine worldview, the emergence of humans began with religious practice, and the first human on earth was a prophet. Despite this, questions about religion have been raised in every era, and in this writing, we present some of the most important questions regarding religious knowledge. Questions such as: What is the human expectation from religion? Should humans expect something from religion or religion from humans? Are our expectations from religion in various fields logical? What are the limits of human expectations from religion? Is religion responsible for individual expectations or does it also respond to social expectations? What is contained in this writing are issues such as: the concept of expectation, types of expectation, explaining the concept of religion, the definition of religious studies, and the origin of the discussion. Then, reactions in facing the issue of human expectation from religion and subsequently, different responses to human expectations from religion are examined.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The first answer; according to one group, since the domain of religion is limited to matters of worship and regulating the relationship between man and God, it is natural that human expectations from religion are limited to guidance regarding salvation in the hereafter.
The second answer; like the first type, it considers religious intervention in various spheres and consequently the answers of religion to human expectations to be minimal, with the difference that proponents of this theory do not see the sphere of religion only in otherworldly matters, but rather permit religious intervention in worldly matters as well, albeit incidentally (am al-bi'arad) and within the scope of certain matters.
If you mean discovery, invention, and theorizing in these dimensions, then no one among the proponents of the fourth theory makes such a claim that religion must play the role of discoverer, inventor, and theorist in all dimensions; and if you mean the guiding approach of religion and the role of religion's affirmation or non-affirmation regarding human sciences, then your sentence "Islamic religion is not responsible for them" appears inconsistent with the fundamental thought of Islam based on the comprehensiveness of religion and Sharia and its perfection, in the sense that Islam oversees all dimensions of man's material and spiritual life.
The third reaction, which is a moderate limit between the two previous theories, accepts that the origin of human expectations from religion is humanistic thought and that the principle should be to ask: "What is religion's expectation from man?", but at the same time, this issue is one of the necessary matters that must be answered at the present time.
(
, 
, 
)
