چکیده:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the way that family communication pattern and conflict style relating to each other. Method: The participants included 206 university students from Shahid Beheshti University. In order to get data, Ritchie Revised Family Communication Pattern (RFCP) and Rahim’s Organization conflict inventory were used. Data were investigated by canonical correlation method in SPSS 16. Results: The results showed that in relation with father, the boys with high conversation used integrating and obliging methods, while the girls used Integrating and Compromising. Also the boys with high conformity used compromising, Avoiding and dominating methods, while the girls with high conformity used dominating and obliging methods. In relation with mother, the boys and the girls with high conversation used Integrating methods, while the boys with high conformity used obliging and dominating methods and the girls used avoiding obliging and dominating methods. Conclusion: In overall it seems conversation always come with useful Integrating method, but most of the time conformity predict using useless methods such as Dominating and Avoiding.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The collaborative variable also plays a deterrent role because although it has a high basic coefficient, its loading is around zero, meaning that even though it did not have a significant relationship with communication patterns itself, its presence in the analysis, by removing the irregular variance of other conflict resolution style variables, has helped improve the relationship.
As stated in the results section, the higher the level of dialogue between boys and their fathers, the more they use collaborative and accommodating conflict resolution styles, respectively.
In the case of girls, the higher the score they obtain in the dimension of dialogue with their fathers, the more they use compromising and collaborative conflict resolution styles, respectively.
Similarly, boys and girls who have reported high dialogue in their communication pattern with their mothers use a collaborative conflict resolution style.
Regarding the congruence dimension, the results also showed that the more congruence boys report with their fathers, the more they use compromising, dominating, and avoiding conflict resolution styles, respectively.
Based on the results, boys who reported high dialogue with their fathers utilized collaborative and accommodating conflict resolution styles, while those who had high congruence utilized compromising, dominating, and avoiding styles.
To this end, this research has addressed the examination of various types of styles and conflict resolution methods between adolescents and fathers and mothers separately, and has investigated the effect of the family communication pattern on these types of styles.
(
, 
, 
)
