Is the rhinoceros meaningless? مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

Jean Louis Barrault says about this play: "Rhinoceroses is a human play that, of course rhinoceros-ism has always existed in human history, meaning from the time the first human society was formed and group members were forced to obey someone called a tribal chief, until today, this matter has truly maintained its continuous flow throughout history (diachronic). Let us note the movement and progress of the dialogues from the whole to the part, meaning from group dialogues to monologues, from a group of characters to a single character and vice versa, from one rhinoceros to a group of rhinoceroses: Act One 1-A crowded and complex scene, the atmosphere of the city square and multi-sided dialogues. In this way, from this perspective, there is no balance in the quality and quantity of relationships, and it is natural that when the hero, to escape the rhinoceros The progress of the story and its course are accompanied by our constant anxiety, because the tableaux are constructed around the main character - Berenger, who does not leave the stage. However, this subject remained hidden in his mind for 20 years until this very rhinoceros, like a color blot that serves as the foundation of "Schneider's" paintings, became the basis of a short story of the same name and then, as usual, the basis of the play. The play, pleasure, joy, and exhilaration of this world; having reached out to all these yet remaining indifferent to them, far from ostentation and in truthfulness, like a rhinoceros, travel alone.