چکیده:
The aim of this article is to study the status of social classes and social mobility in four cities of Fars province and the city of Bushehr in Bushehr province. By randomly selecting these four cities and choosing a port city in the south, more comparison was made possible. A sample with a volume of 1833 was randomly selected from the working population of these five cities, and social classes were examined based on criteria of economic power, organizational power, and professional power. Social mobility was also examined in terms of class and occupational mobility and its types, namely upward, downward, and horizontal mobility, as well as Frechet mobility and intergenerational mobility. The findings show that in the last half century, profound occupational mobility has occurred in our urban society, where the effective factors are education and the change in occupational structure in new societies. Social classes and strata have also undergone transformation and change, but class mobility is not as easy as occupational mobility. Wealth and organizational power are the two main pillars of social classes, and access to them is not as simple as access to education and formal degrees. Different cities in Fars and Bushehr have differences in terms of social classes and social mobility. In a city like Bushehr, the society is more closed, and in cities like Abadeh and Kazerun, the society is more open in terms of social mobility.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Table No. 5: Status of social classes of fathers and sons (Refer to the page image) Table No. 5 shows that small-scale landowners have decreased sharply, while the number of regular employees has increased.
Although in the studied cities the number of people who have changed jobs is not very high (meaning intra-generational mobility is weak), even in this small number, it is shown that again, it is the individual's education that is the main determining factor of their occupational status, followed by dependence on previous occupational status and finally on the father's occupational status.
The cities of Estahban in Fars and Bushehr show that the lack of investment prosperity in the industrial sector and the employment of the new generation in Table No. 17: Analysis of variance of the amount of mobility and migration status (Refer to the page image)Analysis of variance Table No. 17 shows that there has been a relationship between migration and the amount of mobility.
Table No. 10: Relationship between father's class and individual's social mobility in the city of Estahban (Refer to the page image) the new generation has been.
Table No. 9: Relationship between father's class and individual's social mobility in the city of Abadeh (Refer to the page image)Table No. 9 shows that due to agricultural prosperity in Abadeh, children of landowners have a better status than the previous two cities; therefore, to a limited extent, there has been an agricultural sector investor (along with employing others) in the previous generation.
(
, 
, 
)
