چکیده:
As an epistemological field in human knowledge، history has always been affected by various notions and theories. The use of historical evidence and its position are among the important issues in historiography and can lead to various theories. Regarding the desicive role of the evidence in reconstructing the past، thisstudy deals with the framework of historical evidence in historiography and deals with this topic from various perspectives. The main question is how to use the evidence in the reconstruction of the past. In this study، through paying attention to the nature of historical evidence as documents which have surrounded us، the authos have attempted to deal with the manner of using them، and the nature of the historical studies. The article intends to display what kind of findings and documents can be called historical evidence. Man’s interest in knowing history and obtaining information about his environment are the impetus for this study. This study attempts to use library sources and exploit analytical devices to answer the question and intends to use historical evidence in historiography.
خلاصه ماشینی:
An Analysis of the Application of Historical Evidence in Historiography Morteza Noraei* Ali Akbar Jafari** Abstract History, as one of the epistemological fields in the human realm, is influenced by opinions and theories proposed in different eras.
Many historical experts agree that the subject of the science of history is situated in a time that has passed and has no possibility of return; therefore, to reach and find what has been, only the existence of evidence, traces, and documents that have occupied the human surroundings can assist the historian in reconstructing the past.
Despite the numerous and diverse evidences and traces that exist around our lives, which provide a way to the human past, it should not be forgotten that, considering the quality, time of production, and also its application, various types can be considered as documents.
An important point in this section is that although the discussion of evidence in history is actually an examination of the landscape of problems faced by historians regarding the recognition and use of sources, it should not be left unsaid that these problems do not refer to the form of research, i.
Accordingly, since historians intend to build a scientific and solid structure in their scholarly works, the historical materials that can assist them and likely or certainly align the results of their work with the reality of the past are historical evidences, the existential necessity of which is felt in all stages of a research project for documentation purposes.
(
, 
, 
)
