خلاصه ماشینی:
In many narrations, the sayings of great figures, and divine recommendations, it is observed that people have been discouraged from swearing oaths as much as possible; there is no context in which the oath has replaced ethics and conscience in daily life and the wanderings of existence, nor has any encouragement been given in this regard!
s. ) for the reason, he said: I feared that if he spoke as Shurayh suggested and confessed to Monotheism, God might forgive his false oath due to the establishment of Tawhid; therefore, I necessarily prompted him to swear in that manner...
From the entirety of this oath-taking, only the name of God, the name of the religion, the religious book (Avesta), by the souls of loved ones, and by the sword are seen in the poems of the Shahnameh; and there are precise verses regarding this with the same meaning, whose oath is as follows: The ruler said in the name of God, With this name of religion, step forward with faith, By the soul [Razir] of the one who went not to battle, By the precious soul of Esfandiyar, That I shall never turn my face toward an enemy, Nor shall I give a command without my consent, Whatever you say in this matter, For you know the remedy and I am the seeker of the remedy Accordingly, in contrast to the oaths of the Sorvad (Suren) mentioned in previous articles, the oaths of the nobles and the ritual of their execution differed greatly from the aforementioned oaths; they would only suffice with heart-felt remembrances and verbal recollections before their subordinates, and this itself tells of a type of class respect and being worthy of gentleness and attracting compassion.