خلاصه ماشینی:
F. Malenkaya Despite the fact that the academic persona of Aby Krymsky has always been the focus of attention for a large number of historical, literary, folk, and linguistic researchers, his works in the field of Orientalism have thus far been incompletely studied and examined, and until today, no effort has been made to introduce these works in terms of the historical evolution of European Orientalist knowledge at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries.
In addition to the chapter on Sufism in the history of Iran, there are specialized chapters in Krymsky's monographs titled "Hafez and his songs", "Nizami and his contemporaries", "Jami", "An Introduction to Persian Lyric Poets of the 1st to 5th Centuries AD" (translated by F.
" During his student years (1982 to 1985), after he had begun studying and making Ukrainian verse translations of the poems of Rudaki, Sanai, Anvari, Rumi, Khayyam, Hafez, and Jami, he was forced to turn his attention to Sufism and the mystical worldview of medieval Iranians.
In this work, Krymsky actually depicted a kind of literary portrait of Sufi poets such as Sanai, Anvari, Attar, Rumi, and Jami against the historical events of that era and translated examples of their poems from Persian into Ukrainian.
Unfortunately, Krymsky refrained from providing any examples, uncovering symbols, or explaining Sufi terms in his works, and as a result, early 20th-century Ukrainian readers were deprived of understanding the subtle and delicate mystical metaphors in Persian poems.