چکیده:
With a focus on the foundations of conflict in the foreign policies of Iraq and the United States, this article will clarify that the struggle between these two countries will continue. This continuity is costly for both countries. However, the costs of continuing the struggle are very heavy for the United States. Americans believe that one of the arguments for the events of September 11th is this very continuation of their struggle. The presence of the United States in the Persian Gulf region, driven by motives such as containing the Iraqi regime, has practically led to an increase in Arab Salafi radicalism tendencies in the region. Therefore, the shift from the policy of maintaining Saddam to contain Iran, to the policy of removing Saddam while simultaneously containing Iran, was reflected in Bush's famous speech under the 'Axis of Evil.' However, how to remove Saddam while simultaneously containing Iran is a very serious subject of discussion for the United States in military operations against Saddam. In this article, all major predictable and proposed operational methods against Saddam are discussed. These methods include unilateral military coups. The option that would be operationally feasible will practically reduce the ability to contain Iran. The conflict between method and consequences is the main reason for the continuation of Saddam's power and the hardships of the oppressed people of Iraq under economic blockade. In other words, the continuation of this conflict has made the timing of the operation uncertain.
خلاصه ماشینی:
1- Foundations of Conflict The September 11th event, by which the United States suffered its greatest blow to its prestige against its national interests and global prestige in the post-World War II era, became a turning point in this country's foreign policy outlook toward the Middle East region.
4 George Bush's speech, the President of the United States, and the naming of Iran, Iraq, and North Korea as the axis of evil, provoked severe criticisms against America's foreign policy on the international stage.
Although this operation dealt heavy blows to Iraq's military and intelligence systems, in practical psychological terms, it was Iraq, or in other words, Saddam Hussein himself, who flaunted his uncontrollable power against the American containment plan before the world.
12 This option previously meant the rejection of other options as well, but after Operation Desert Fox, while it became an urgent need for American forces, the plan to assist Iraqi opposition groups to overthrow Saddam Hussein was also approved by Congress.
Before the September 11th event, because the policy of dual containment of Iran and Iraq was in place, the discussion of overthrowing Saddam's government was not raised with such intensity.
Therefore, an option that both creates operational power for America and significantly reduces or at least minimizes its negative security consequences for America and the Zionist regime, is a paradox that Americans are currently facing in formulating military policy for the overthrow of Saddam; it might be said to be the same paradox that the Iraqi people have been dealing with since Operation Desert Storm and the 1991 Intifada.
(
, 
, 
)
