خلاصه ماشینی:
Now, based on my definition, a moral human is one whose circle of permissions, even if by a negligible amount, is smaller than their circle of capabilities; this means there are actions that this human, while having the power to perform them, does not allow themselves to do.
However, while we humans, both men and women, differ from one another in these five factors, this does not necessarily lead to a difference in external ethics; because external ethics is based on contracts, and regardless of any age, genetics, gender, psychological type, or education and upbringing, we must be committed to our contracts.
But internal ethics is highly influenced by these five factors; differences in gender, psychological type, education and upbringing, etc.
Fifth premise: In this premise, I must refer to two interrelated matters: One is that despite the differences between external ethics and internal ethics, both must address the deep psychological needs of humans.
In the fourth premise, they deepen this distinction, stating: internal ethics is highly influenced by the five differentiating factors among humans, but external ethics can be completely independent of our five differences.
According to him, the obstacle is that ethics must be derived from the deep needs of a human being and their psychological type, and these types vary among individuals; consequently, different ethics must be formulated for different types, so a society cannot have a uniform morality.