Right to earn a living or trade مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

The result is that if the landlord vacates the leased property for any reason by paying the right to business or trade, they will suffer in two respects: First, suppose they themselves engage in a commercial activity in that location, and then, as mentioned, they give up their profession or pass away; neither they nor their heirs, who are the owners, will be able to recover the money they paid for the eviction from the new tenant. However, we justify this departure of the legislator through the lens of justice by stating that in Clause 2 of this article, the conditions and qualities of the lease are considered effective in determining the amount of the right to business or trade, and if the condition of the location is excellent in terms of building type, the lease agreement is concluded under certain conditions in favor of the landlord: For example, the amount of rent increases, and at the time of leasing, the amount of the right to business or trade naturally decreases; therefore, with this justification, it can be said that the landlord benefits from the precision, time spent, and high expenses incurred for the desirability of the leased premises, not the tenant. 4-Condition of the leased premises in terms of building type This element, which is one of the elements of the right to business or trade or is at least effective in determining its amount, is created due to the landlord's precision, time spent, and bearing of heavy expenses; however, the amount of the right to business or trade increases in favor of the tenant without the tenant having intervened in its creation or being aware of its existence at the time of leasing.