چکیده:
The UN Security Council is the only authority to prescribe the right to legal use of force on the basis of legal principles and rules. The 1937 Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of Terrorism (Geneva Convention) is the first international convention on terrorism. The process and mechanisms needed to define and delineate counterterrorism in international law are very slow. The US government has often used the Security Council mechanism, and otherwise, by force or concluding incomplete treaties with some countries, to justify its illegal actions internationally. The assassination is considered to be the most effective senior military official in command of the Takfiri Counter-Terrorism Front in the US-led region, under the direct command of the US President. The following article examines the assassination of General Suleimani for violating the principles of international and domestic law. This article states that citing a defense by the United States lacks the necessary elements to assign action to Iran. The claim of preventive defense is also not approved by international judicial custom. The perspective of international lawyers not only confirms the matter, but also denies it and opposes it. The US military attack on January 3, was contrary to the Iraqi -US security agreement and the Roman statute, and is a case of violations and violations.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The assassination of the most effective senior military official commanding the front against Takfiri terrorism in the region by American forces, under the direct order of the President of the United States, is considered to fall into this category of actions.
Some states, including the United States, are attempting to expand and generalize established legal doctrines and theories, such as the right of self-defense under Article (51 of the Charter), by using force against an imminent and certain attack — preemptive self-defense — and a potential attack — preventive defense.
Coleman, a United Nations human rights reporter, mentioned in his series of tweets regarding this matter that the act of target killing has no compatibility with an imminent attack that international law deems necessary to justify action for self-defense.
It is certain that regarding the assassination of the senior military commander Imam Hossein University Scientific Publications (peace be upon him) 17 Iran - General Soleimani - there was no recourse to the issue of collective security stipulated in Chapter VII of the Charter, and the Security Council also did not have such a resolution; therefore, United States officials have attempted to present the issue under the title of self-defense and self-defence1.
Similarly, the United States of America, by adopting the doctrine of "preemptive self-defense," announced that it did not consider itself committed to observing the rules governing the non-use of force in the Charter and would act on its own if American interests were endangered.
(
, 
, 
)
