چکیده:
Dictionaries are among the resources that throughout the ages have been considered guardians of a nation's language, culture, and knowledge. The religious, cultural, political, and economic relations of nations with one another have always had a significant impact on the creation of such works. For this reason, we see that on one hand, after the emergence of Islam, Iranians gradually devoted themselves to composing Arabic dictionaries, and on the other hand, the people living in the land of India undertook the composition of Persian dictionaries and loanwords. Among them, the Moayed al-Fazla dictionary, which was composed in 529 AH by 'Mohammad bin Lad Dehlavi'—considering the first letter as the word 'Kitab' and the last letter as 'Bab', and consisting of three chapters in Arabic, Persian, and Turkish—holds special importance. This valuable dictionary has only been published twice in India in two volumes, but unfortunately, these versions lack accuracy and integrity in many places; therefore, here we have endeavored, while correcting the Arabic and Turkish chapters, to point out some of the errors and mistakes of the Indian printing using an eclectic method between three manuscripts from the Majlis, University of Tehran, Astan Quds, and also the Indian print.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Since a precise and polished correction of this valuable dictionary has not yet been produced, and the Indian print was formed without considering correct and scientific criteria in the matter of correction, with inappropriate additions and subtractions, and many inaccuracies in mentioning entries, word meanings, and even the chapters of the book, we set out to first proceed with the correction of the Arabic and Turkic parts of this dictionary by considering three manuscripts titled "Majlis," "Daneshgah," and "Astaan Quds," as well as the "Indian print" which is referred to here with the abbreviation "Ch"; and by basing it on the Majlis manuscript—which is considered the oldest manuscript from the author's time—and also using an eclectic method; then, by mentioning several examples, we will point out some of the flaws and errors of the Indian printed version.
C) Adding a Bab (chapter) and Fasl (section) In this dictionary, which is compiled such that each letter is in a book according to its first letter, and each letter is in a Bab according to its last letter, and each Bab is divided into three Fasls (Arabic, Persian, and Turkish), in some places, Muhammad bin Lad, the author of the dictionary, has not included certain Babs and Fasls because they were not used in the Persian language and texts, or for any other reason, and the scribes of the manuscripts followed his method in recording and writing.
(
, 
, 
)
