The Struggle Between Continental Philosophy and Analytical Philosophy مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

Second, Continental philosophy generally considers the transcendental conditions of experience to be variable and dynamic, and emphasizes the belief that phenomena are primarily subject to factors and contexts that rely on time, place, language, culture, and the history of the world, whereas modern science, in most cases, ignores these factors in its research. 1 It is worth noting that in the twentieth century, Husserl's phenomenology can be considered a turning point for Continental philosophy, although his ideas have long been of special interest within the analytical philosophy tradition. Based on this same reasoning, Continental thinkers consider analytical philosophy to be dry, frozen, and tedious, and claim that analytical philosophy is excessively preoccupied with eternal truths; therefore, in every case, it unintentionally freezes dynamic and growing concepts and, in this way, is oblivious to the complexity of their diverse concepts and functions in changing conditions. They claim that with the entry of Frege into the philosophical scene, analytical thinkers were able to break free from the circle of influence of the dominant psychological school and, by relying on the philosophy of language and a firm belief in logic, science, and mathematics, have been able to provide a basis for acceptable scientific proofs for themselves and other thinkers. Because the continental tradition in philosophy has become a means for critiquing current conditions and has paved the way for understanding the existing crisis in the realm of faith in the vulgar bourgeois world, European sciences, the epistemological formulation of the human sciences, nihilism, or neglect of existence and its like.