چکیده:
The main goal of the present writing is to reflect and recount the theoretical-paradigmatic gaps of the two power-oriented approaches, realist and neorealist, in explaining the nuclear crisis of the Islamic Republic of Iran at the level of the system and international politics. In fact, according to the findings of this research, the analysis of the aforementioned subject from the perspective of the two realist and neorealist approaches does not align with the existing discursive reality.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Explaining Iran's Nuclear Crisis from the Perspective of Realist and Neorealist Approaches; Dimensions and Approaches Dr. Armin Amini* Abstract The primary goal of the present writing is to reflect and recount the theoretical-paradigmatic gaps of two power-oriented approaches, Realism and Neorealism, in explaining the nuclear crisis of the Islamic Republic of Iran at the level of the international system and politics.
-------------- (1)- Security Regional Subsystem (2)- Geo culture (3)- Competition-Cooperator (4)- Utilization (5)- Others (6)- Homeland security The Islamic Republic of Iran, which considers the specific atmosphere of "threat building"1 and "confrontation"2 of neo-conservatives and individuals affiliated with military-industrial complexes3 in international politics to be contrary to global comprehensive stability and security4 (Amini, Persuading Public Opinion, 2013:), believes that according to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), original nuclear technology-holding states must strive toward the transfer and technical assistance to other countries for the purpose of "proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology," a matter that is completely consistent with the criteria of international law, as well as the advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice of the United Nations and the custom arising from common sense5.
Second Discourse: Explaining Iran's Nuclear Status from the Perspective of the Realism Approach Fundamentally, the realism approach, as the basic paradigm1 governing the international system during the Cold War era, considers the concept of power as the central axis of politics2 and strategy3 of nation-states4.
(
, 
, 
)
