چکیده:
The emphasis of this writing is on the theoretical and practical continuity of three main topics in the study of international political economy, namely: 1- Globalization from the perspectives of realism, idealism, and historical structuralism, 2- North-North relations, and 3- North-South relations. Accordingly, in the present research, it is possible to analyze a wide range of developments in the field of global political economy, including issues raised regarding the end of the Cold War, the collapse of the socialist camp, the emergence of new states in Eastern Europe, as well as the emergence of common threats such as environmental disasters, within the framework of the aforementioned three topics.
خلاصه ماشینی:
It is an acceptable reality that the process of globalization affects some countries and regimes more than others, and even this process can be a threat against the independence of countries in some contexts, but globalization does not prevent countries from national policymaking; rather, this process leads to disintegration and competition or union and cooperation (Sklair, 1988: 297) Although the economic interdependence of countries has been a prominent feature of the international economy in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, current developments in the field of globalization have caused the expansion of this interdependence, and with the advancement of technology, communications, and transportation, its speed has increased.
Some international political economy theorists, following Antonio Gramsci's model, argue that globalization has led to the development of a transnational bloc consisting of the largest multinational companies, world banks, international economic organizations, and international trade groups that are active in most capitalist countries.
In conditions where the highest level of trade interactions among the European Union, North America, and Japan, as well as with a set of wealthy Third World countries—including emerging Eastern governments, former satellites of the Soviet Union, and Southeast Asia—is increasing, it can be considered a strong possibility that poor countries in the South will remain excluded from the wheel of international trade and economy and continue to be marginalized.
(
, 
, 
)
