چکیده:
Following the fundamental changes in the structure of the international system because of the collapse of the Soviet Union، many analysts will pay attention to the question of the essential trends that will be included in the agenda for world security. This writing is intended to offer an answer to this question in which the author has proposed the following hypothesis: The world security plan involves two agendas. The first agenda corresponds to the contents of world hegemony and refers to the positive rivalry between the United States and European Union. The second agenda relates to the grounds for the rise of conflicts، and ushers in the entry of the Middle East to the context of security developments in the 21st Century. In order to explain the subject، the author has initially presented two main scenarios which are pursued by the great actors in the stage of international politics (namely the American and European scenarios for the world order) and according to them the lines of conflict have been derived and described. According to this hypothesis، the tendency of the world system to hegemonic structure and heightened political-security tensions in the Middle East form two general phenomena of the 21st Century.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Security in the New International System: Scenarios and Issues Dr. Asghar Eftekhari Research Deputy of the Institute for Strategic Studies Date of Submission: 2012/01/23 Date of Approval: 2012/01/24 Abstract Following the transformation of the international system structure due to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the question regarding the fundamental trends that will be on the agenda of the international security program has drawn the attention of many analysts.
"5 Since "Zbigniew Brzezinski" expressed this idea in the book "World Chessboard" in 1997, a diverse range of texts and viewpoints have been published and presented, all of which are shaped by this main argument: the capability of the United States as the sole superpower of the twenty-first century is such that it can effectively play a role in managing and guiding the issues and trends of the global order.
In other words, two main pillars of the union's international policy can be listed as follows: First Pillar: Strategic Alliance with the United States of America According to the security assessment of the "Independent Working Group" of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the nature of European security is such that it cannot be considered the product of war and conflict— Chart No.
The complexity of security issues in the international arena, their high cost, the limitations of great powers, the formation of a global network, the emergence of new powers, and finally the increase in the capability of the European Union, all indicate that the United States of America cannot alone manage the program of creating world order.
(
, 
, 
)
