چکیده:
Defining the concept of opposition and classifying its spectrums is among the ambiguous topics of political sociology, which has a complete connection to the category of the country's internal security. In this writing, while defining opposition and distinguishing it into two spectrums—legal opposition and regime-change opposition—the author discusses and examines the interaction of each of these two spectrums on the internal security of the Islamic Republic of Iran. After examining the way opposition groups to the system were formed and their security threats over the past 20 years, the author concludes, in explaining the current state of society, that creating the groundwork and facilitating conditions for the activity of legal opposition can prevent the emergence and formation of hostile or regime-change opposition.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In this writing, while defining opposition and distinguishing it into two spectrums, legal opposition and brandist opposition, the author examines the interaction of each of these two spectrums on the internal security of the Islamic Republic of Iran and investigates the manner of formation and stages of activity of opposing groups and their security threats over the past 20 years.
As we see in most revolutions, on the threshold of victory or in a revolutionary situation, the system and society are divided into two poles; most opposition forces, by disregarding internal conflicts their own, form an alliance against the ruling system; however, what is decisive is the gradual or sudden joining of part of the political forces in power with the legal opposition and the ruling elites into the spectrum of opponents.