With Spring in Golestan مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

In essence, the noun accompanied by "ra" is the object of means (maf'ul-e wasila) through "near" or "for," which, after the removal of the preposition, has been brought forward and accompanied by "ra," and in terms of meaning, it provides emphasis and specification, as the modern form of the above sentences would be: A- A portion of his reprehensible qualities became known for (or near) the king. As can be observed, the particle "ra" in the above examples occurs after a noun which, in modern composition and simple writing, should be placed as an object of means or a complement using the word "for" (baraye), making the above phrases appear as follows: A- For the ignorant, there is nothing better than silence, and if you had known this benefit, you would not have been (yourself) ignorant. " 6- There is another group of sentences in which the particle "ra" is also "the sign of the madaf-elayh in the inversion and transposition of the genitive," but the madaf, which is the subject and the link of the sentence, is from the combinations of "shayestan and sha'idan" (to be worthy/fitting), such as: A- This traitor is not worthy of friendship B- Whatever does not endure, is not worthy of attachment C- The kingdom and wealth of the world are not worthy of trust D- Even his half-eaten portion is worthy of him E- It is not worthy of a sage to overlook the foolishness of a commoner with forbearance Removing "ra" and arranging the above phrases in a modern manner yields the following sentences: A- This traitor is not worthy of friendship.