Questions regarding the Urban Land Law مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

It must be said that inquiring from the said Ministry and obtaining a permit from that ministry no longer has legal validity due to the explicit repeal of Article 9 of the law and its notes, because the necessity of inquiring and obtaining the agreement of the said Ministry has lost its raison d'etre with the repeal of the aforementioned Article 9; as it is evident from the study of Article 9 and its notes, the purpose of enacting the regulations of the said article and its notes was to obtain legal permission and authority for the government and the municipality so that, within a certain period, in case of a lack of vacant and state-owned lands in cities for housing and public services, they could provide and acquire urban fallow and active lands belonging to individuals, respectively. However, since June 12, 1992 (22/6/1371), when the deadline for implementing the aforementioned Article 9 expired, Clause 11 of Article 19 of the executive regulation, which had been approved by the Council of Ministers regarding the determination of how and the manner of implementing the provisions of Article 9 of the law, has become obsolete, and notary public offices no longer have any obligation regarding inquiring from the Ministry of Housing and obtaining a permit for the preparation of a transfer and transfer, they do not have any obligation, because as mentioned, since the government and the municipality can no longer proceed with the acquisition of urban fallow and active lands based on the aforementioned repealed Article 9, therefore, obtaining the favorable opinion of the Ministry of Housing or the lack thereof regarding the transfer of the said lands is irrelevant.