چکیده:
Ghazali is one of the most famous thinkers of the Islamic world whose views and thoughts have had a profound impact on subsequent thinkers and intellectuals, especially among the Sunnis. Although Ghazali, through the authorship of his most famous work titled Tahafut al-Falasifa, has severely criticized the views of philosophers and even in his writings, given his Ash'arite tendencies, does not speak well of the "Shiites"; however, the influence on a personality such as "Sadr al-Muta'allihin" — who is one of the most famous Imami philosophers and theologians — from the interpretive views of Ghazali is a matter worthy of reflection and attention. Why and how did Mulla Sadra fall under the influence of his views? In this article, the author has attempted, while addressing this question, to explain how Sadr al-Muta'allihin was influenced by the interpretive views of Ghazali.
خلاصه ماشینی:
278) Sadr al-Muta'allihin, under the influence of Ghazali, has said: The origin of the error of blameworthy and censured knowledge with the sciences of the Sharia is due to the transformation and distortion that has occurred in the meanings and implications of words; in explaining this matter, while quoting Ghazali's words in his own commentary, he says: The word "fiqh" is among the words whose meaning has undergone distortion and transformation, and now it is interpreted as knowing and understanding various types of strange fatwas; whereas in the early era (the era of the Companions and the Successors), fiqh was interpreted as the knowledge of the science of the hereafter, identifying the soul and its maladies and dangers, as well as perceiving the insignificance of the world and becoming aware of the blessings that the righteous will enjoy in the hereafter, and expressing awe and fear in the heart towards the Essence of the Almighty; and the purpose of "tafaqquh" in religion and "inzar" (warning) — which is mentioned in the noble verse "و لیتفقهوا فی الدین و لینذروا قومهم إذا رجعوا" (At-Tawbah, 122) — is this kind of science; not the science of rulings and matters related to divorce, imprecation, manumission, permission, and their like, because dealing with these matters causes hardness of the human heart and the loss of his awe towards the Essence of the Almighty; just as this meaning can be seen regarding those who have turned solely to fiqh (Sadr al-Muta'allihin, al-Tafsir, Vol. 2, p.
(
, 
, 
)
