چکیده:
This article refers to the most important new analyses of the Ashura event, which were mainly presented in the 1960s and 1970s. Salehi Najafabadi introduces the goal of Imam Hussain (peace be upon him) as establishing an Islamic government and considers the occurrence of the Ashura incident as a product of unpredictable events. Dr. Shariati and Martyr Motahhari analyze the Imam's movement as epic and according to the logic of martyrdom. Dr. Shahidi also considers political teleology to be far from the logic of Imam (peace be upon him) and analyzes His movement according to the fulfillment of proof based on the invitation of the Kufans.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Salehi Najafabadi introduces the goal of Imam Hussain (peace be upon him) as the establishment of an Islamic government and considers the occurrence of the Ashura incident as a product of unpredictable events.
The View of the Author of the Book 'Shahid-e Javid' Salehi believes that Imam Hussain (peace be upon him) was waiting for an opportunity to take actions towards reforming the situation of Muslims after the death of Muawiyah.
In fact, for almost the entire period from when Yazid tried to obtain allegiance from him through the governor of Medina until the time of his martyrdom, the Imam was in a defensive position and everything was imposed upon him; except that during the Imam's movement to Kufa, the aspect of uprising was also intended.
Salehi attributes the reason for this event to the deprivation of immunity for the Imam in Mecca and Medina; whereas with the historical records of the Kufans and the conditions that had arisen, victory in Kufa was almost impossible, and he could have gone towards Yemen, where he had supporters, and Muhammad Hanifa had also suggested it.
In the fourth section of the book, Salehi addresses the goals of Imam Hussain and considers his goal to be the struggle against oppression, the establishment of a government, and the support of Islam.
(
, 
, 
)
