Peirce's Semiotics مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

In Peirce's view, thought itself is considered a sign and becomes meaningful through an interpretation derived from another thought or perception. " English John Locke had been used; nevertheless, the concept of this word as an interdisciplinary aspect for examining phenomena that exist in various fields only evolved in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by Charles Sanders Peirce, an American philosopher, independently and without connection to the work of Saussure. He did not consider the meaning of signs to be self-evident; rather, in his view, signs become meaningful through an interpretation obtained via another thought or conception. For Peirce, the meaning of every thought is determined by the triad relationship of object, Sign, and Interpretant is determined. Peirce says that we, like the child, use abduction unconsciously to construct our thoughts; we engage in conceptualization, and all concepts are constructed based on abduction, which is a connection between the thoughts we are aware of and other thoughts or signs that are in our minds but of which we are not aware. Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness We previously mentioned that according to Peirce, every relational sign has a triadic nature that includes the sign itself, the object, and its interpretant. Law Thirdness Brute facts Secondness Quality Firstness Legisign Sinsign Qualisign Repressentamen Firstness Symbol Index Icon Object Secondness Argument Dicent Rheme Interpretant Thirdness Sign based on its own characteristic In this regard, a sign can be one of these three types: a) Qualisign: From a phenomenological and ontological perspective regarding the category of Firstness, Peirce considers the sign to be merely a mental quality and calls it a Qualisign.