چکیده:
For some time, theorists and experts have been endeavoring to present their views on various subjects, and a series of sessions on various topics have been held by the Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought, which this time focused on gathering around the theme of political legitimacy. The guests of this session include: Hujjat al-Islam Dr. Behrouz Lak (Secretary), Hujjat al-Islam Dr. Firahi, whose multiple article axes will be reviewed and critiqued, Hujjat al-Islam Seyyed Abbas Nabavi (Critic), and Hujjat al-Islam Dr. Najarzadegan (Critic). It is worth mentioning that Hujjat al-Islam Khosropanah and Norouzi also presented remarks, which are being presented to the readers.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In this session, three issues will be discussed; that is, just as Dr. Firahi has based his article on three fundamental axes, our effort in this session is also to follow these three axes: The first axis is the divisions of legitimacy and the nature of legitimacy from the perspective of political philosophy, which has led Dr. Firahi to divide it into agentic legitimacy - which is directed towards the process of government and the process of selecting rulers - and teleological legitimacy - which is directed towards the end and goal of government - a discussion that Hujjat al-Islam Nabavi will present regarding the classification.
It is worth mentioning that behind all these discussions raised about legitimacy, in the space of political and international thought, the efficiencies and applications of political systems are accepted in a way as existing systems; meaning even if you say a regime is completely illegitimate, but since it exists now and assuming legitimacy in the way we explained, this regime is not legal and the people do not accept it, or for example, it is not pursuing the ends that it should pursue, it must be said that the political thought prevailing in the international arena does not seek to take the consequences of this issue seriously; rather, it resolves it within its set of relations; and says this regime, whether legitimate or illegitimate, can ultimately interact with us, therefore it provides a justification and interpretation for its existence.
(
, 
, 
)
