چکیده:
The discussion of 'Finality of Prophethood' in the contemporary era took on a new form in modern discourse; religious intellectuals, with an approach distinct from the traditional view and with questions arising from modernist thought, engaged in a specific analysis of revelation, prophethood, and finality; this type of attitude toward the issue began with the words of Iqbal Lahori and expanded and evolved with Shahid Motahhari's critiques of his statements. In this article, the views of these two great figures regarding 'Finality of Prophethood' and Shahid Motahhari's critiques of Iqbal Lahori's views are addressed; and at the end, Dr. Soroush's critique of Professor Motahhari and its response are stated.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Valiollah Abbasi (1) Abstract: The discussion of "Finality" (Khatamiyat) in the contemporary era took on a new form in modern theology; religious intellectuals, with an approach distinct from the traditional view and with questions arising from modernist thought, engaged in a specific analysis of revelation, prophethood, and finality; this type of attitude toward the issue began with the words of Iqbal Lahori and expanded and evolved with the critiques of Shahid Motahhari on his words.
The discussion of "Finality" in the contemporary era took on a new form in modern theology; religious intellectuals, with an approach distinct from the traditional view and with questions arising from modernist thought, engaged in a specific analysis of revelation, prophethood, and finality; this type of attitude toward the issue began with the words of Iqbal Lahori and expanded and evolved with the critiques of Shahid Motahhari on his words.
" (1) According to Shahid Motahhari, on one hand, Iqbal Lahori emphasizes revelation as a form of knowledge derived from instinct and inner experience and its connection to the ancient era, the result of which is the general negation of human need for revelation and the finality of religion; and on the other hand, Iqbal Lahori explicitly states the element of movement in the structure of Islam based on the continuity of Ijtihad, which necessitates the need for revelation in the new era, while these two are incompatible with each other; in fact, Professor Motahhari unveils the lack of internal coherence in Iqbal Lahori's thought.
(
, 
, 
)
