چکیده:
Archetypic criticism is an approach which has had considerable development in writing the scientific papers in the recent decades. It is mostly used in literary studies and is interconnected to the literature. Designed by a research plan, this paper studies and analyzes, with a movement viewpoint, the archetypic criticism in Iran in a movement form discussed in literary criticism in the academic papers related to the epic genre, and analyzes the discourse of this criticism, repetitive elements and developments of such elements in papers. Statistical population includes the study of a record of papers and books from the early century according to the Shahname-research studies then concentration of scientific- research papers in the 1990s, written with an archetypic criticism approach in analysis of literary works related to epic genre. It also considers the considerable and effective individuals on introducing this approach, its discourse, historical and thematic developments of archetypic criticism approach in epic in a descriptive- analytical method. Interdisciplinary studies have been paid attention with an archetypic approach since the 1960s. In the 1980s and 1990s, many authors especially those who are now well-known in this field opened a new way in studies of archetypic criticism. The dominance of content analyses, comparative reading and discovering the meaning are some considerable specifications of papers of this period. In the 2000s and 2010s many academic papers were produced that, though the more systematic in structure, but have many frequent damages in their writing and analyses which are mentioned in paper in details.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The statistical community includes a background of articles and books in the field of Shahnameh studies written since the beginning of the century, as well as scientific-research articles that, from the 1990s onwards, with an archetypal criticism approach, have [analyzed] texts related to the epic genre have explored.
This is both due to the nature and special capability of literary texts to align with this approach and, with a passing glance at the number of works published using this approach, it seems that the thirst for recognizing collective archetypes in texts of Persian literature has turned into a cultural issue; as according to the studies conducted, the Jungian approach has been used in articles related to psychology more than other approaches, and about 80 percent of the volume of articles in the field of psychoanalytic criticism is dedicated to this approach (see Mahdavi and Gholamhosseinzadeh, 1392: 80).
The articles evaluated in this research include studies written in the epic genre with an archetypal criticism approach, from the beginning of the introduction of Jungian perspectives in Iran, i.
The prominent presence of Houra Yavari in the article writing of this decade has placed her among the first individuals who correctly introduce mythological and archetypal criticism by applying it to ancient Persian texts and narratives.
In the 1980s and 1990s, Houra Yavari, Jalal Sattari, Abolghasem Esmailpour, Cyrus Shamisa, Mohammad Mokhtari, and Shahrokh Maskoub introduced archetypal criticism approaches into epic literature; however, Mokhtari and Maskoub are authors of various books, and no work by them was found in the collection of articles under review.
(
, 
, 
)
