چکیده:
Among the evidences for 'Ghina' are narrations in which 'Qawl al-Zur' (falsehood/perjury) is applied to 'Ghina' (singing). Conceptually, 'Ghina' refers to a sound that possesses the characteristic of 'Tarab' (musical ecstasy), and content does not play a role in it; however, the very use of the term 'Qawl' (speech/word) in the relevant narrations strengthens the possibility that what is intended is 'Ghina' within the context of invalid speech. This research, relying on jurisprudential-usuli sources and using an analytical method, has proven that this type of inference is incorrect; because 'Qawl al-Zur' means speech that has a tendency, which by its generality includes tendency in terms of the quality of the sound. Furthermore, the predominant issuance of this category of narrations in the context of rejecting the doubt regarding the attribution of the permissibility of Ghina to the Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) supports the desired conclusion regarding the lack of intention for 'Ghina' within invalid speech. Therefore, the author has reached the conclusion that the content of the speech is not included in the chapter of 'Ghina'.
خلاصه ماشینی:
" Conceptually, "Ghina" refers to a sound that possesses the characteristic of "tarab" (musical ecstasy/emotion), and content plays no role in it; however, the very use of the term "qawl" (speech/saying) in the relevant narrations strengthens the possibility that what is intended is "Ghina" within the context of false speech.
Therefore, in the subject of discussion, it must also be seen whether the mental conception of that era considered "ghina," with its conceptual scope, to be an instance of "qawl al-zur"—meaning with the same boundaries of its customary and linguistic meaning (frivolous sound)—or whether it only understood a certain type of "ghina" (such as ghina involving false speech)?
In response to this objection, it must be added that even assuming the acceptance of the generality of the implications of "qawl al-zur," no change will occur toward proving the desired goal (application to the concept of ghina); because if it is said that "qawl al-zur" is broader than false content, it must be clarified whether in the application to "ghina," its conceptual meaning (with the explanation previously mentioned) or a specific instance has been considered?
In this regard, someone might claim the existence of a clue, to which it must be added: If the reason and clue for such a claim (intending a specific instance) is the concept of "ghina," meaning the interpretation of "ghina" as speech with false content, then this reason is rejected; because "ghina" is not defined by speech, but rather custom, linguistics, and jurists all consider it to be in the category of the quality of sound.
(
, 
, 
)
