چکیده:
The purpose of this paper is to examine the change in Turkish strategy against ISIS from "support" to "battling". In order to understand is used the approach of the "structure of the international system," which is a synthesis of "regional hegemonic structure" and "trans-regional repulse structure" to indicate why Turkey is carried out to the "big change". For this purpose, is used descriptive-analytical method and relied on documentary sources through library research. The findings show because of the limitations of the regional structure due to superiority of Kurds, the axis of resistance and Russia as the dominant forces on the one hand and Trans-regional systemic pressures due to discredit front of the US, EU and international institutions / world public opinion, on the other hand, turkey was forced to strategic turn in its policy against ISIS. So, this kind of revisionism comes from a tradition based on realistic in order to restore power and national security not from the revolutionary tradition based on real determination to fight terrorism.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Given the aforementioned issue, the main question of the article is: "What effect has the structure of the international system had on Turkey's policy towards ISIS?" The hypothesis of the article is also that "under the influence of unbearable structural pressures resulting from regional and extra-regional requirements, this country was inevitably forced to fight this terrorist group to benefit from the support of the United States and the European Union, and also to repair its own public and regional diplomatic image.
No-Entery List international system has had on Turkey's policy towards ISIS?" The hypothesis of the article is also that "under the influence of unbearable structural pressures resulting from regional and extra-regional requirements, this country was inevitably forced to fight this terrorist group to benefit from the support of the United States and the European Union, and also to repair its own public and regional diplomatic image.
ISIS attacks reduced political tension among Kurdish movements and caused them to unite for the first time in modern history against a common enemy; in other words, after the ISIS attack on Kobani, the conflicts that had existed among Kurdish organizations for years were set aside through an approach of agreement between these groups (Halhalli, 2015: 98); for example, the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, despite being considered one of the rivals of the Democratic Union Party, joined with the Syrian Kurds due to the progress of ISIS and the fear that this threat would destroy the state-building process of this group and stood with them against a common enemy; although this region is a collaborator and partner for Turkey, and its alignment with the Syrian Kurds is considered a fundamental threat to this country.
(
, 
, 
)
