چکیده:
Since scattered and diverse ideas with lofty or postmodern themes exist in the intellectual atmosphere of the contemporary world, the distinction between these ideas must be examined, and their correctness or incorrectness identified and discussed. Therefore, addressing postmodern theology is important. The thoughts of societies are under the influence of ideas that are spreading globally. The postmodern world is, in a sense, seeking to globalize its own ideas. Consequently, they have a significant impact—in terms of political, cultural, artistic, social, and even religious beliefs—on the thoughts of societies, and this profound influence is due to the lack of analysis regarding the doctrines of this school. For this reason, the author of this article intends to present Griffin's view, who is one of the theologians of the postmodern school and serves as the foundation of religious thought in postmodern society, and to reread and analyze his beliefs. In conclusion, based on the points stated regarding the relevant subject, the internal contradictions of postmodern theology will be clearly visible. Finally, the existing contradictions in postmodernist thought are utilized with its specific instances.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Some postmodernists believe that we should discard words like truth and reality; because they indicate an illusory and misleading objectivity, and the epistemological foundations of postmodernism (if this combination is correct; since epistemology is among the denied assumptions of postmodernism) are based on this principle that our inferential results and achievements are historically dependent on certain conditions; meaning they depend on a specific time and place.
According to this general conception or definition, the word God refers to a personal, purposeful, purely good, and omnipotent being; a being who created the world and acts within it according to His own will, a being who sometimes becomes an object of human experience and, especially, as the source of norms moral and religious experiences, is the ultimate foundation of meaning and hope, and thus only He is worthy of worship (ibid.
The recovery of belief in God, while maintaining the formal commitments of modernity toward freedom, experience, and reason, is today only possible based on a postmodern worldview that simultaneously dominates both the essential assumptions of modernity regarding nature and experience, and the assumptions of traditional theism regarding divine power (ibid.
Now, this reality, which is the supreme power, will influence the environment, and the fact that he considers belief in God to be naturalistic theism and regards radical experience as the cause of knowledge, all indicate that, unlike idealists, he accepts that an existence exists externally that possesses such attributes, and in this way, it is understandable (Sayyari and Gharamalki, 2002, p.
(
, 
, 
)
