Imam Reza (peace be upon him) and Tark al-Awla of the Prophets in the Quran مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

The problem with the Ahl al-Hadith was more significant; they were unrefined individuals who had committed themselves to accepting the literal meaning of verses and narrations, spreading incorrect interpretations of some Quranic verses regarding Tawhid (monotheism) and the infallibility of the prophets among the people, to which Imam Reza (AS) responded to some of these doubts and incorrect interpretations. The author of the interpretation Ghara'ib al-Qur'an, under verse 16 of Surah al-Qasas, has said: "The person whom Moses (AS) killed was a Harbi disbeliever, and the blood of a Harbi disbeliever is permissible, and he considers that killing to be permissible (and this means that act was permissible, but he continues by writing that) this action of mine, which was a departure from the recommended, is from the work of Satan" (Nishapuri, 1416 AH, Vol. 5, p. Criticism and Review Allamah Majlisi, after discussing the verses and narrations that raise doubts regarding the disobedience and error of prophets, writes: Tark al-Awla is an expression of a Makruh act. Fifth view; opposition to an Ershadi (instructional) command A number of people consider Tark al-Awla to mean opposition to an Ershadi command (Tabataba'i, 1417 AH, Vol. 12, p. 6. Based on the narrations and especially the defense of Imam Reza (AS) of the infallibility of the prophets in the Quran, it seems that not only has no sin been issued from them, but according to the scholars of Islam, even 'Tark al-Awla' has not occurred.